The closest substitute and the sharpest contrast in the category: KnowledgeOwl bills $100 a month plus $25 per author and never counts readers, where Helpjuice bills $249 flat and counts every login including read-only Internal Viewers. That makes KnowledgeOwl cheaper for a small writing team with a large internal audience and Helpjuice cheaper once more than about thirty people need credentials.
The same standalone knowledge base sold the opposite way. Document360 publishes no tiers and no numbers and quotes against team accounts, workspaces, languages and AI usage, while Helpjuice prints $249, $449 and $799 with the user ceiling on the card.
Aimed at engineering documentation rather than a customer help centre, and priced per seat with a git-backed source of truth, so content lives in a repository the team already controls. Helpjuice takes custody and hands content back as CSV and HTML.
Prices per site at $15 to $79 a month and keeps the articles in your own Notion workspace, so cancelling removes the site and not the content. Cheaper by an order of magnitude, with no user model, no SSO and no chatbot of Swifty's scope.
Ships a help centre inside a per-agent suite, so the knowledge base arrives with seats bought for ticketing anyway. The comparison only makes sense for a team that also needs an inbox; Helpjuice has no ticketing, no inbox and no channels.
3 of 9 not published by Helpjuice, checked