Favicon of AdaFavicon of Lorikeet

Ada vs Lorikeet

A side-by-side comparison of Ada and Lorikeet on what each one charges, what it meters, and which plan every capability actually sits on.

The short answer

1 of the 12 capabilities tracked on both differs.

Ada and Lorikeet at a glance
MeasureAdaLorikeet
Starts atSales-gated$1,500/mo
Charged perNot publishedThe workspace
AI billed atNot published$0.25 per credit
Included, where the other says no0 capabilities1 capability

Capability by capability

1 of the 12 capabilities tracked on both products differs.

Channels

Channels capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
EmailIncludedThe Ada Email Channel bills as an Email Conversation with a 72-hour inactivity window.IncludedAll plans. Billed at 0.95 credits per resolution on Start, 0.80 on Scale.
Live chatIncludedChat is the default channel and the default billed unit. This is bot chat with escalation, not a human live-chat console.IncludedAll plans. Lorikeet Chat deploys the agent on a website without a ticketing system behind it.
VoiceIncludedIncludedAll plans, at 1.50 credits per resolution on Start and 1.20 on Scale.
SMSNot publishedIncludedAll plans, priced identically to chat and email.

AI resolution

AI resolution capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
Autonomous resolution agentIncludedUnknown. No plans are published.IncludedThe Concierge Agent is the product. Billing exists only for resolutions and per-ticket routing or QA actions.
Resolution over knowledge baseIncludedKnowledge is ingested from the customer's existing systems rather than migrated: Zendesk Guide, Salesforce Knowledge, Genesys, GuruKB, Helpjuice, Paligo, Contentful, Docusaurus and GitHub are all listed as content sources.IncludedKnowledge is read in place from Confluence, Guru, Google Docs and Notion. No knowledge base migration is required.
Action-taking (API calls)IncludedAPI tools, code tools and MCP tools are documented, and tool invocations appear in the conversation export as used_mcp with an outcome_status.IncludedConcierge actions and data integrations are listed as unlimited on every plan including Start.
Handoff to humanIncludedEscalation is a first-class contractual concept: an Automated Resolution is defined as a conversation that is not escalated, and the export carries is_escalated. Handoff blocks are documented separately.Not publishedLorikeet never writes the words escalation or handoff in its pricing or product text. Whether a handoff exists, and whether it bills, are both unpublished.
Guardrails & citationsIncludedCitations only. Each conversation records used_articles with article id, name, url and source. Guardrails are not published as a named feature, so the guardrail half of this attribute is Unknown.IncludedCustom guardrails are unlimited on every plan including Start; Enterprise adds custom guardrail work.
Multilingual AIIncludedMultilingual support, language switching and manual translations are documented, and the conversation export carries an ISO-639-1 language field. Ada publishes no supported-language count, so the number is Unknown.Not publishedNo language count or list is published anywhere on the site.

AI assist

AI assist capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
SummarizationIncludedThe conversation export carries inquiry_summary and a machine-written automated_resolution_classification_reason.Not published
Auto-taggingIncludedThe conversation object carries classifications, topics and intents alongside the Ada-generated automated_resolution_classification.IncludedAll plans, billed separately at 0.30 credits per ticket on Start and 0.25 on Scale.

AI voice

AI voice capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
Voice agentIncludedVoice Services are governed by their own Service Specific Terms with a separate billed unit and unpublished Fair Use Limits.IncludedWorks with any platform that supports call forwarding, including Amazon Connect, Twilio, Genesys Cloud, Dialpad, Vonage, Five9 and AirCall, plus the Lorikeet SDK and API.

QA & workforce

QA & workforce capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
Automated QA coverageNot publishedIncludedAll plans, billed at 0.30 credits per ticket on Start and 0.25 on Scale.

Reporting

Reporting capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
Raw data exportIncludedBulk, cursor-paginated conversation and message export endpoints returning JSON, on a self-serve API key.Not publishedNo export documentation of any kind is published: no article, no API reference, no bulk export UI.
CSAT / NPSIncludedCSAT score, style and free-text feedback plus CES and NPS all sit on the conversation object. There is no separate analytics or report export endpoint.Not published

Enterprise

Enterprise capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
Role-based access controlIncludedUnknown. No plans are published, so no role is known to be tier-gated.Not published
Audit logsIncludedUnknown. No plans are published.Not published
HIPAA / BAANot publishedAda publishes a HIPAA attestation dated 2024-09-30 in its trust center. Whether it will sign a BAA, and on what terms, is not published.IncludedScale and above, published as "Start + HIPAA BAA". Explicitly not available on Start at $1,500/month.
SOC 2IncludedUnknown. No plans are published.IncludedStart and above. The pricing page specifies SOC 2 Type 2.
ISO 27001NoNot listed in the trust center. Ada states its security program follows CIS Controls v8.0 rather than ISO.IncludedStart and above. ISO 27001:2022.
GDPRIncludedNot plan-gated.Not publishedGDPR is not named on the trust center, the privacy policy or the pricing page.
Data residencyIncludedUnknown. Europe is an opt-in enrollment rather than a default; whether enrollment carries a price is not published.Not publishedNo customer-selectable region is published. Infrastructure is Google Cloud Platform and all four listed sub-processors are in the USA, so there is no EU-only inference path.
Right-to-erasure toolingIncludedA bulk end-user deletion API with a pollable deletion job, plus a Data Compliance API for deleting chatter data that the docs now mark deprecated.Not published

Developer

Developer capabilities compared between Ada and Lorikeet
CapabilityAdaLorikeet
REST APIIncludedREST with JSON, rotatable API keys, opt-in versioning for breaking changes, cursor-based pagination and a downloadable OpenAPI 3.1 spec.IncludedThe published API initiates voice conversations, and two public HTTP endpoints handle demo booking and support Q&A. No API reference covering data extraction exists.
WebhooksIncludedWebhook endpoints are listable via the API, plus documented end-user created, end-user updated and audit log event webhooks.Not published
SDKsNot publishedIncludedThe Lorikeet SDK embeds the agent in a customer's own product.

Both entries last checked Sep 9, 2026.

What Ada costs

  • Billing unit
    Per conversation
  • Free tier
    Not published
  • AI pricing
    Not published
  • Vendor calls it
    Conversation
  • Human handoff
    Still billed
  • Reopened chat
    Billed again
  • AI billing window
    1d of inactivity
  • Data export
    Self-serve
  • Automation export
    Full

2 of 9 not published by Ada, checked

What Lorikeet costs

$1,500/month
2 published plans, billed annually
  • Billing unit
    Single-component prepaid usage
  • Free tier
    No
  • AI pricing
    Not published
  • Vendor calls it
    Credit (routing or analytics tagging, per ticket)
  • Human handoff
    Not published
  • Reopened chat
    Not published
  • AI billing window
    Not published
  • Data export
    Not published
  • Automation export
    Not published

6 of 9 not published by Lorikeet, checked