Favicon of IntercomFavicon of Pylon

Intercom vs Pylon

A side-by-side comparison of Intercom and Pylon on what each one charges, what it meters, and which plan every capability actually sits on.

Capability by capability

Nothing we track differs between them.

Channels

Channels capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
EmailIncludedAll plansIncludedAny address, plus Gmail and Outlook Mail connectors.
Live chatIncludedAll plansIncludedChat widget with mobile SDKs.
In-app messengerIncludedAll plansNot published
VoiceIncludedAll plans, pay-as-you-goIncludedListed as a Phone and SMS channel. No voice pricing or minute rate is published.
SMSIncludedAll plans, pay-as-you-goIncludedListed as a Phone and SMS channel.
WhatsAppIncludedAll plans, pay-as-you-goIncluded
Slack ConnectNot publishedA Slack integration is included on every plan, but Intercom does not say whether it covers Slack Connect shared channels, which is the thing a B2B support team actually needs. Recorded as Unknown rather than credited.IncludedUnknown. No plan table is published, so no channel can be shown as gated or ungated.
Microsoft TeamsNot publishedIncludedUnknown. No plan table is published.
Community forumNoNo community product. Nothing in the plan comparison offers forums, member profiles or moderation, so a team that wants customers answering each other buys that elsewhere.Not published

Ticketing

Ticketing capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Shared inboxIncludedAll plans. Multiple team inboxes arrive at Advanced, so the entry plan is a single shared inbox.Not published
Ticket queuesIncludedAll plans carry the ticketing system. The customer-facing tickets portal is Advanced and above.Not published
SLA policiesIncludedExpertNot published
Business hoursIncludedExpert only, as team office hours, alongside team reply time settings. Neither is available on Essential or Advanced.Not published
Macros / saved repliesNot publishedIncludedProduct feature with a dedicated API endpoint, so saved replies are extractable.
Custom fieldsNot publishedIncluded
Custom objectsNot publishedIncluded
Ticket formsNot publishedIncluded

Routing & automation

Routing & automation capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Round-robin assignmentIncludedAdvancedNot published
Load balancingIncludedExpert only, as workload management. Advanced gets round-robin assignment but not capacity-aware distribution.Not published
TriggersIncludedSimple automations are on every plan; the Workflows automation builder starts at Advanced.IncludedDocumented product feature. Absent from the API reference index, so trigger logic cannot be exported.
Workflow builderIncludedAdvancedNot published
Escalation rulesIncludedAll plans, and they carry billing consequences that are published: an escalation triggered by workspace-level guidance or escalation rules is not charged as an outcome, while a handoff written into a Procedure is.Not published

AI resolution

AI resolution capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Autonomous resolution agentIncludedAll plans, meteredNot published
Resolution over knowledge baseIncludedAll plans. Fin answers from the help centre and the Procedures a team writes, and the vendor is explicit about the boundary: "Fin trains only on your knowledge and Procedures, never on data you haven't approved".Not published
Action-taking (API calls)IncludedAll plans, through Procedures, which Fin executes and which can end in a configured handoff to a workflow, a team or a teammate. A successful Procedure handoff is itself a billable outcome at $0.99.Not published
Handoff to humanIncludedAll plansNot published
Guardrails & citationsIncludedAll plans. Fin can be tested before it reaches anyone: "Before Fin ever talks to a real customer, run realistic Simulations against edge cases, including vulnerable-customer and compliance scenarios." Fine-tuning is opt-out, with data deleted within 30 days.Not published
Multilingual AIIncludedAll plansNot published

AI assist

AI assist capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Reply draftingPaid add-onCopilot, sold per seat on any plan at $29 per agent per month billed annually or $35 billed monthly. Every full seat gets 10 conversations a month included; unlimited use is the paid add-on.Not published
TranslationIncludedAll plans, metered: 10 AI auto-translation conversations per agent per month are included free, matching the 10 free Copilot conversations.Not published

AI voice

AI voice capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Voice agentIncludedFin Voice exists and is the one part of Fin with no published price: "To use Fin Voice and for pricing details, please contact Sales." Outcome pricing at $0.99 is stated to cover chat and email only.Not published

Knowledge base

Knowledge base capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Public help centerIncludedAll plansNot published
Multi-brandIncludedExpertNot published
LocalizationIncludedAdvancedNot published
In-product widgetIncludedAll plans. The Messenger is included everywhere, and the pricing page bundles "free, unlimited live chat, support email, in-app chats, banners, and tooltips" into every tier.Not published
AI answers over KBIncludedAll plans. Fin is included on every tier and answers from help centre content; only the outcomes it produces are charged.Not published

Self-service

Self-service capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Chatbot flowsIncludedAdvanced and above, as the Workflows automation builder. Essential is limited to simple automations, so scripted multi-step flows are the main reason to leave the entry plan.Not published

QA & workforce

QA & workforce capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Conversation QA scoringPaid add-onThe Pro add-on, from $99 a month, covering analysis of 1,000 conversations a month plus 2,000 credits, with extra credits at $0.01. Sold on any plan.Not published
Automated QA coveragePaid add-onSame Pro add-on, pitched at full coverage rather than sampling: "see and continuously improve 100% of your customer conversations" and "check if quality meets your standards".Not published
ForecastingNoNo workforce management product. Workload management at Expert distributes conversations against capacity; it does not forecast contact volume or build a staffing plan.Not published
SchedulingNoNo shift scheduling. Team office hours at Expert set when a team is open, which is not the same as rostering people against a forecast.Not published
Adherence trackingNoNo adherence tracking. Nothing in the plan comparison measures agents against a schedule, because there is no schedule to measure against.Not published

Reporting

Reporting capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
Prebuilt dashboardsIncludedAll plans, as pre-built reports.Not published
Custom reportsIncludedAdvanced and above. Essential is limited to the pre-built set.Not published
Raw data exportIncludedAll plans, and self-serve, but split by object: contacts export to CSV from the UI, while conversations are reachable only through the API or the S3 export.Not published
Data warehouse syncIncludedBulk conversation export to Amazon S3 as JSON is documented with no plan condition, which is a stronger position than the UI export it sits beside.IncludedUnknown. No plan table is published.
Real-time reportingIncludedExpert only. The real-time dashboard sits with SSO, HIPAA and SLAs behind the top tier.Not published

Collaboration

Collaboration capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
AssignmentIncludedAll plans have assignment; the automation around it is gated. Round-robin arrives at Advanced with multiple team inboxes, and capacity-aware workload management at Expert.Not published

Enterprise

Enterprise capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
SAML SSOIncludedExpertNot publishedRoles and User Management documentation exists, but SSO is not named on the trust page or in the docs security overview.
SCIM provisioningIncludedExpert in effectNot publishedNot named anywhere on the trust page or in the security documentation.
Role-based access controlIncludedTeammate roles exist and can be mapped from identity provider groups, which ties the useful version of this to SCIM and therefore to Expert.Not published
Custom rolesIncludedTeammate roles, mappable from identity-provider groups. The plan gate is not published.IncludedUnknown. No plan table is published.
Audit logsIncludedTeammate Activity Logs exist as a feature. Intercom does not publish which plan they require, and they have no documented export path.IncludedUnknown. No plan table is published.
IP allowlistIncludedIP restrictions are listed on the security page alongside SSO, 2FA and SCIM. No plan gate is published.Not published
Multi-brandIncludedExpertNot published
HIPAA / BAAIncludedExpertIncludedEnterprise tier only. Verbatim: "We're happy to sign a BAA in the enterprise plan".
SOC 2IncludedNot plan-gatedIncludedNo gate stated. SOC 2 Type 2, monitored via Vanta.
ISO 27001IncludedNot plan-gatedIncludedNo gate stated. ISO 27001 plus ISO 42001 for AI management systems.
GDPRIncludedNot plan-gatedIncludedNo gate stated. DPA available on request.
Data residencyIncludedNot publishedNot publishedNo region choice is stated on the trust page, in the docs security overview, or on the trust center at trust.usepylon.com.
Data retention policyIncludedPublished for AI data specifically rather than as a general policy: fine-tuning is opt-out "with data deleted within 30 days", and third-party model providers are "contractually barred from training on your data, with zero retention once a response is generated".Not published
Right-to-erasure toolingIncludedDocumented as a GDPR workflow, covering both export and deletion of a contact's data on request.Not published

Developer

Developer capabilities compared between Intercom and Pylon
CapabilityIntercomPylon
REST APIIncludedAll plansIncluded
WebhooksNot publishedNot published on the pricing page or in the plan comparison. The REST API is documented with generous limits; webhooks are not named.Included
SDKsIncludedAll plans. The Messenger ships as a web and in-app component, and "in-app chats" are bundled free into every tier alongside banners and tooltips.Not published
App frameworkIncludedAn app store exists and apps can be built against it. Intercom does not publish an app count on any page that renders, so the size of the ecosystem is unverified.Not published
Published rate limitsIncludedAll plansNot publishedNo rate limit is stated on the API reference index, the Authentication page or the Errors page.

Both entries last checked Sep 9, 2026.

What Intercom costs

$29/seat/month
4 published plans, billed annually
  • Billing unit
    Seat + usage hybrid
  • Free tier
    No, 14-day trial
  • AI pricing
    $0.99 per AI resolution
  • Vendor calls it
    Outcome
  • Human handoff
    Still billed
  • Reopened chat
    Refunded
  • AI billing window
    1d of inactivity
  • Data export
    Self-serve
  • Automation export
    Not offered

What Pylon costs

  • Billing unit
    No price is published anywhere
  • Free tier
    Not published
  • AI pricing
    Not published
  • Vendor calls it
    Not published
  • Human handoff
    Not published
  • Reopened chat
    Not published
  • AI billing window
    Not published
  • Data export
    Self-serve
  • Automation export
    Partial

6 of 9 not published by Pylon, checked