Favicon of AdaFavicon of Intercom

Ada vs Intercom

A side-by-side comparison of Ada and Intercom on what each one charges, what it meters, and which plan every capability actually sits on.

The short answer

1 of the 19 capabilities tracked on both differs.

Ada and Intercom at a glance
MeasureAdaIntercom
Starts atSales-gated$29/seat/mo
Charged perNot publishedEach agent seat
AI billed atNot published$0.99 per AI resolution
Included, where the other says no0 capabilities1 capability

Capability by capability

1 of the 19 capabilities tracked on both products differs.

Channels

Channels capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
EmailIncludedThe Ada Email Channel bills as an Email Conversation with a 72-hour inactivity window.IncludedAll plans
Live chatIncludedChat is the default channel and the default billed unit. This is bot chat with escalation, not a human live-chat console.IncludedAll plans
In-app messengerNot publishedIncludedAll plans
VoiceIncludedIncludedAll plans, pay-as-you-go
SMSNot publishedIncludedAll plans, pay-as-you-go
WhatsAppNot publishedIncludedAll plans, pay-as-you-go
Community forumNot publishedNoNo community product. Nothing in the plan comparison offers forums, member profiles or moderation, so a team that wants customers answering each other buys that elsewhere.

Ticketing

Ticketing capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Shared inboxNot publishedIncludedAll plans. Multiple team inboxes arrive at Advanced, so the entry plan is a single shared inbox.
Ticket queuesNot publishedIncludedAll plans carry the ticketing system. The customer-facing tickets portal is Advanced and above.
SLA policiesNot publishedIncludedExpert
Business hoursNot publishedIncludedExpert only, as team office hours, alongside team reply time settings. Neither is available on Essential or Advanced.

Routing & automation

Routing & automation capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Round-robin assignmentNot publishedIncludedAdvanced
Load balancingNot publishedIncludedExpert only, as workload management. Advanced gets round-robin assignment but not capacity-aware distribution.
TriggersNot publishedIncludedSimple automations are on every plan; the Workflows automation builder starts at Advanced.
Workflow builderNot publishedIncludedAdvanced
Escalation rulesNot publishedIncludedAll plans, and they carry billing consequences that are published: an escalation triggered by workspace-level guidance or escalation rules is not charged as an outcome, while a handoff written into a Procedure is.

AI resolution

AI resolution capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Autonomous resolution agentIncludedUnknown. No plans are published.IncludedAll plans, metered
Resolution over knowledge baseIncludedKnowledge is ingested from the customer's existing systems rather than migrated: Zendesk Guide, Salesforce Knowledge, Genesys, GuruKB, Helpjuice, Paligo, Contentful, Docusaurus and GitHub are all listed as content sources.IncludedAll plans. Fin answers from the help centre and the Procedures a team writes, and the vendor is explicit about the boundary: "Fin trains only on your knowledge and Procedures, never on data you haven't approved".
Action-taking (API calls)IncludedAPI tools, code tools and MCP tools are documented, and tool invocations appear in the conversation export as used_mcp with an outcome_status.IncludedAll plans, through Procedures, which Fin executes and which can end in a configured handoff to a workflow, a team or a teammate. A successful Procedure handoff is itself a billable outcome at $0.99.
Handoff to humanIncludedEscalation is a first-class contractual concept: an Automated Resolution is defined as a conversation that is not escalated, and the export carries is_escalated. Handoff blocks are documented separately.IncludedAll plans
Guardrails & citationsIncludedCitations only. Each conversation records used_articles with article id, name, url and source. Guardrails are not published as a named feature, so the guardrail half of this attribute is Unknown.IncludedAll plans. Fin can be tested before it reaches anyone: "Before Fin ever talks to a real customer, run realistic Simulations against edge cases, including vulnerable-customer and compliance scenarios." Fine-tuning is opt-out, with data deleted within 30 days.
Multilingual AIIncludedMultilingual support, language switching and manual translations are documented, and the conversation export carries an ISO-639-1 language field. Ada publishes no supported-language count, so the number is Unknown.IncludedAll plans

AI assist

AI assist capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Reply draftingNot publishedPaid add-onCopilot, sold per seat on any plan at $29 per agent per month billed annually or $35 billed monthly. Every full seat gets 10 conversations a month included; unlimited use is the paid add-on.
SummarizationIncludedThe conversation export carries inquiry_summary and a machine-written automated_resolution_classification_reason.Not publishedNot published. Copilot is described as an assistant for agent efficiency without an itemised feature list, so which of drafting, summarising and rewriting it covers cannot be read off a published page.
TranslationNot publishedIncludedAll plans, metered: 10 AI auto-translation conversations per agent per month are included free, matching the 10 free Copilot conversations.
Auto-taggingIncludedThe conversation object carries classifications, topics and intents alongside the Ada-generated automated_resolution_classification.Not published

AI voice

AI voice capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Voice agentIncludedVoice Services are governed by their own Service Specific Terms with a separate billed unit and unpublished Fair Use Limits.IncludedFin Voice exists and is the one part of Fin with no published price: "To use Fin Voice and for pricing details, please contact Sales." Outcome pricing at $0.99 is stated to cover chat and email only.

Knowledge base

Knowledge base capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Public help centerNot publishedIncludedAll plans
Multi-brandNot publishedIncludedExpert
LocalizationNot publishedIncludedAdvanced
In-product widgetNot publishedIncludedAll plans. The Messenger is included everywhere, and the pricing page bundles "free, unlimited live chat, support email, in-app chats, banners, and tooltips" into every tier.
AI answers over KBNot publishedIncludedAll plans. Fin is included on every tier and answers from help centre content; only the outcomes it produces are charged.

Self-service

Self-service capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Chatbot flowsNot publishedIncludedAdvanced and above, as the Workflows automation builder. Essential is limited to simple automations, so scripted multi-step flows are the main reason to leave the entry plan.

QA & workforce

QA & workforce capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Conversation QA scoringNot publishedPaid add-onThe Pro add-on, from $99 a month, covering analysis of 1,000 conversations a month plus 2,000 credits, with extra credits at $0.01. Sold on any plan.
Automated QA coverageNot publishedPaid add-onSame Pro add-on, pitched at full coverage rather than sampling: "see and continuously improve 100% of your customer conversations" and "check if quality meets your standards".
ForecastingNot publishedNoNo workforce management product. Workload management at Expert distributes conversations against capacity; it does not forecast contact volume or build a staffing plan.
SchedulingNot publishedNoNo shift scheduling. Team office hours at Expert set when a team is open, which is not the same as rostering people against a forecast.
Adherence trackingNot publishedNoNo adherence tracking. Nothing in the plan comparison measures agents against a schedule, because there is no schedule to measure against.

Reporting

Reporting capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
Prebuilt dashboardsNot publishedIncludedAll plans, as pre-built reports.
Custom reportsNot publishedIncludedAdvanced and above. Essential is limited to the pre-built set.
Raw data exportIncludedBulk, cursor-paginated conversation and message export endpoints returning JSON, on a self-serve API key.IncludedAll plans, and self-serve, but split by object: contacts export to CSV from the UI, while conversations are reachable only through the API or the S3 export.
Data warehouse syncNot publishedIncludedBulk conversation export to Amazon S3 as JSON is documented with no plan condition, which is a stronger position than the UI export it sits beside.
CSAT / NPSIncludedCSAT score, style and free-text feedback plus CES and NPS all sit on the conversation object. There is no separate analytics or report export endpoint.Not publishedNot published in the plan comparison. Conversation ratings are widely used in the product but appear on no reachable pricing or plan page, so the tier gate cannot be established.
Real-time reportingNot publishedIncludedExpert only. The real-time dashboard sits with SSO, HIPAA and SLAs behind the top tier.

Collaboration

Collaboration capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
AssignmentNot publishedIncludedAll plans have assignment; the automation around it is gated. Round-robin arrives at Advanced with multiple team inboxes, and capacity-aware workload management at Expert.

Enterprise

Enterprise capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
SAML SSONot publishedIncludedExpert
SCIM provisioningNot publishedIncludedExpert in effect
Role-based access controlIncludedUnknown. No plans are published, so no role is known to be tier-gated.IncludedTeammate roles exist and can be mapped from identity provider groups, which ties the useful version of this to SCIM and therefore to Expert.
Custom rolesNot publishedThe team-access docs describe four fixed roles and a 25-row matrix. No mechanism for defining a custom role appears there.IncludedTeammate roles, mappable from identity-provider groups. The plan gate is not published.
Audit logsIncludedUnknown. No plans are published.IncludedTeammate Activity Logs exist as a feature. Intercom does not publish which plan they require, and they have no documented export path.
IP allowlistNot publishedIncludedIP restrictions are listed on the security page alongside SSO, 2FA and SCIM. No plan gate is published.
Multi-brandNot publishedIncludedExpert
HIPAA / BAANot publishedAda publishes a HIPAA attestation dated 2024-09-30 in its trust center. Whether it will sign a BAA, and on what terms, is not published.IncludedExpert
SOC 2IncludedUnknown. No plans are published.IncludedNot plan-gated
ISO 27001NoNot listed in the trust center. Ada states its security program follows CIS Controls v8.0 rather than ISO.IncludedNot plan-gated
GDPRIncludedNot plan-gated.IncludedNot plan-gated
Data residencyIncludedUnknown. Europe is an opt-in enrollment rather than a default; whether enrollment carries a price is not published.IncludedNot published
Data retention policyNot publishedDeletion mechanisms are published but no default retention period is. Checked the API reference and the terms.IncludedPublished for AI data specifically rather than as a general policy: fine-tuning is opt-out "with data deleted within 30 days", and third-party model providers are "contractually barred from training on your data, with zero retention once a response is generated".
Right-to-erasure toolingIncludedA bulk end-user deletion API with a pollable deletion job, plus a Data Compliance API for deleting chatter data that the docs now mark deprecated.IncludedDocumented as a GDPR workflow, covering both export and deletion of a contact's data on request.

Developer

Developer capabilities compared between Ada and Intercom
CapabilityAdaIntercom
REST APIIncludedREST with JSON, rotatable API keys, opt-in versioning for breaking changes, cursor-based pagination and a downloadable OpenAPI 3.1 spec.IncludedAll plans
WebhooksIncludedWebhook endpoints are listable via the API, plus documented end-user created, end-user updated and audit log event webhooks.Not publishedNot published on the pricing page or in the plan comparison. The REST API is documented with generous limits; webhooks are not named.
SDKsNot publishedIncludedAll plans. The Messenger ships as a web and in-app component, and "in-app chats" are bundled free into every tier alongside banners and tooltips.
App frameworkNot publishedIncludedAn app store exists and apps can be built against it. Intercom does not publish an app count on any page that renders, so the size of the ecosystem is unverified.
Published rate limitsNot publishedThe API Overview states that global rate limits apply and that certain API families apply their own local limits, but publishes no figure. /reference/rate-limits and /reference/limits both return 404.IncludedAll plans

Both entries last checked Sep 9, 2026.

What Ada costs

  • Billing unit
    Per conversation
  • Free tier
    Not published
  • AI pricing
    Not published
  • Vendor calls it
    Conversation
  • Human handoff
    Still billed
  • Reopened chat
    Billed again
  • AI billing window
    1d of inactivity
  • Data export
    Self-serve
  • Automation export
    Full

2 of 9 not published by Ada, checked

What Intercom costs

$29/seat/month
4 published plans, billed annually
  • Billing unit
    Seat + usage hybrid
  • Free tier
    No, 14-day trial
  • AI pricing
    $0.99 per AI resolution
  • Vendor calls it
    Outcome
  • Human handoff
    Still billed
  • Reopened chat
    Refunded
  • AI billing window
    1d of inactivity
  • Data export
    Self-serve
  • Automation export
    Not offered